When Temperatures Rise—The Challenges of Hot Landfills
Tetra Tech’s James Walker, senior client manager, discusses challenges solid waste managers may encounter related to hot landfills as well as prevention and management tactics.
The issue of hot landfills has become a significant challenge to the waste industry over the last 10 years. When a landfill’s temperature begins to elevate significantly, rapid response is necessary to minimize impacts to the public and costs to the owner. Each hot landfill is unique, and I wanted to share the experience gained from these sites to educate others on the prevention, detection, and solutions to manage these facilities. Design of odor, gas, and leachate controls for these sites are outside the norm, and the lessons learned are valuable for efficiently managing new hot landfills and reducing the associated cost.
What is a hot landfill and what are its impacts?
Landfills are generally considered to be hot landfills when temperatures exceed 140°F, although some site and regional conditions might explain higher normal temperatures. However, temperatures of up to 250°F have been measured in municipal solid waste landfills when they are undergoing a subsurface reaction. High heat has even been measured in saturated waste. At these temperatures, “thermal runaway” can occur. This means the increased temperature changes conditions in a way that causes even further increases, often leading to destructive results.
One potential casualty of hot landfills is high-density polyethylene (HDPE), which is commonly used for landfill liners and pipes. HDPE loses half its strength at every 60°F rise in temperature. At 140°F, HDPE will buckle at a very small load, and at 260°F the HDPE melts.
Hot landfills lead to significantly more landfill gas (LFG), so much that operators can have difficulty keeping up with it. This also may lead to large scale settlement, which may allow more rainwater to enter the landfill. It also can lead to an increase in odors—and neighbor complaints. Leachate volumes can increase significantly, and there may not be enough storage for efficient management. Finally, a hot landfill may produce high-strength leachate, which may be difficult and expensive to treat and dispose.
Not every hot landfill is considered a fire. For example, what on the surface looks like smoke may really be steam and hydrogen gas with moderate carbon monoxide (CO) levels resulting from exposure of a gas well for remedial activities.
An ounce of prevention
When it comes to hot landfills, an ounce of prevention is worth a ton of cure. Wastes to be especially cautious of include aluminum dross and other metal waste, sulfur treatment media, hot loads, and lime materials. Chemical reactions from mixtures of these materials can contribute to heat accumulation at localized areas within a landfill.
Unfortunately, toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) tests on special wastes do not tell the whole story! Be sure to add ASTM C-1702 (Standard Test Method for Measurement of Heat of Hydration of Hydraulic Cementitious Materials Using Isothermal Conduction Calorimetry) to your special waste testing protocol before you consider accepting special wastes. Also, be sure to keep liquids and gases under control—not allowing them to build leachate head or pressure at depth in the waste mass—and keep a close watch on your LFG chemistry. Calculate the CH4/CO2 ratio at every LFG well. If it is less than 1.0, take action. Finally, make sure the hydrogen levels in LFG wells are less than 0.5 percent by volume.
Additional causes of excessive heat in a landfill
Aside from overheating materials, there are a few other causes of landfill heat. First off, there are actions taken for NSPS compliance, for example, tuning wells down to stay in compliance with 131°F criteria, or pulling too hard to stay below the 500 parts per million by volume (ppmv) methane concentration for surface emission monitoring (SEM).
Then there are operations that lead to perched leachate, which retains heat and impairs LFG removal. These include not stripping out old roads prior to filling, not stripping out intermediate cover, using clay or silt for daily cover, and recirculating too much leachate.
Management strategies for heat in landfills
The two most effective strategies for managing heat in landfills include getting the liquids out—1 gallon per minute at 150°F = 949 BTU/minute; and then getting the LFG out; where 30 cubic feet per minute at 145°F = 387 BTU/minute.
Here’s a suggested progression of remedial activities for a hot landfill:
- Increase the number of LFG wells with dewatering capabilities where necessary
- Construct localized capping for target control of odor and air intrusion
- Increase operations and maintenance (O&M) activities to ensure uninterrupted gas and leachate collection
- Add LFG and leachate piping to critical areas
- Upgrade gas collection and control system (GCCS) headers to accommodate additional wells
- Upgrade flare as necessary
- Repair excessive settlement to prevent ponding and control infiltration
- Add air and forcemain upgrades as dewatering wells are added
- Expand capping for control of odor and air intrusion, if necessary
- Consider separation of clean and dirty gas and leachate systems for improved liquids management
- Implement leachate and GCCS treatment when the quality warrants improvement
- Finally, prepare operation, maintenance, and monitoring (OM&M) plan once systems are in place and in a controlled state.
Operators would do well to take a very proactive approach to preventing hot landfills. Otherwise, the results can prove extremely expensive. Here are just a few examples of the impacts of hot landfills that I have seen: Loss of millions of yards of airspace, regulatory fines, expensive remediation and O&M costs, additional wells per acre for GCCS control, waste excavation to create an isolation break, and construction of costly storage tanks and wastewater treatment plants to manage leachate.
Landfills can take a very long time to cool off—and millions of dollars to remediate! At one landfill I am familiar with, the hot landfill condition cost more than $100 million dollars, about 100 times more than it would have cost to prevent. That does not include other lasting impacts, such as loss of public trust and loss of airspace. At this site, control and containment was the long-term resolution. Eleven years ago at one hot landfill, landfill gas was measured at 280°F, while it is now at 200°F. Odor, gas, and leachate are under control, but continued settlement effects need to be dealt with. The facility is operated in a controlled manner and operators have implemented an OM&M plan for management.